City of Highland Park City Council met June 22.
Here is the minutes provided by the council:
CALL TO ORDER
At 6:00 PM, Mayor Rotering called the meeting to order and asked for a roll call:
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Mayor Rotering, Councilman Stolberg, Councilwoman Stone, Councilman Kaufman, Councilman Blumberg, Councilman Knobel, Councilman Holleman
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Neukirch, Fire Chief Amidei, Community Development Director Fontane, Police Chief Jogmen, Public Works Director Kanapareddy, Finance Director Logan, Assistant City Manager Sabo, Deputy City Clerk Palbitska
ALSO PRESENT: Corporation Counsel Elrod, Deputy Corporation Counsel Passman
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Approval of the Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting Held on June 8, 2020
Councilwoman Stone moved to approve the minutes of the Special City Council meeting that was held on June 8, 2020. Councilman Kaufman seconded the motion.
Upon a roll call vote, the Mayor declared the motion passed unanimously.
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Kim Stone, Councilwoman
SECONDER: Daniel Kaufman, Councilman
AYES: Mayor Rotering, Councilmen Stolberg, Stone, Kaufman, Blumberg, Knobel, Holleman
APPROVAL OF WARRANT LIST
1. Warrant List and Wire Transfers from May 29, 2020 to June 11, 2020.
Councilman Kaufman moved to approve the Warrant List. Councilman Blumberg seconded the motion. Upon a roll call vote, the Mayor declared the motion passed unanimously.
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Daniel Kaufman, Councilman
SECONDER: Anthony Blumberg, Councilman
AYES: Mayor Rotering, Councilmen Stolberg, Stone, Kaufman, Blumberg, Knobel, Holleman
REPORT OF MAYOR
Mayor Rotering discussed a proclamation that was issued to recognize June 19th as Juneteenth.
BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC (Citizens wishing to be heard regarding items not listed on this agenda)
City Manager Neukirch stated that the City gives the opportunity for individuals to email or call the City if they have any comments, feedback or recommendations for the City Council meeting. She noted that the City received public comments before the City Council meeting and read them into the record.
Judy Miller, Chair Leadership Team for the League of Women Voters Highland Park/Highwood, commented on the amendments that were being proposed to public comments during virtual City Council meetings and other City Boards, Commissions and Committees.
Mayor Rotering explained that the City's practice has been for the Presiding Officer for the Commission or of the City Council to be the person that will call on individuals to speak during meetings; this is not a change from the practices that are currently in place and have been in place.
Corporation Counsel Elrod explained what the difference was between a public meeting and a public hearing. He noted that there has been an opportunity for public comment on specific agenda items during a public meeting but it is not an obligation.
City Manager Neukirch stated that it has been the City's practice to forward on the comments that are provided either before or after meetings to the requested board, committee or group accordingly and those types of communication are not limited to any word count; the word count is subject to those items that are read during a meeting.
Michael Laxner, Highland Park resident, requested that some form of the Zoom meetings continue in the future to allow more participation from the public and requested the City review and work to update the City's Master Plan.
City Manager Neukirch noted that Mr. Laxner's communication was shared with the City Council.
Mayor Rotering stated that the first question posed by Mr. Laxner was addressed. She explained that the Council and staff have discussed having a holistic review of the City's Master Plan.
City Manager Neukirch explained that on the work plan for 2020, there are three corridor studies that are comprehensive and target specific areas.
Mayor Rotering noted that a critical component of reviewing and revising a Master Plan includes a charrette and given the challenges with social distancing currently, a review may not be as productive as it would be in maybe a year when potentially larger gatherings can take place safely.
Walter Hainsfurther, Highland Park resident, commented and voiced his concerns on the inclusionary housing component of the proposed development at 1849 Green Bay Road and 1910 Second Street.
Mayor Rotering noted that the Council will take Mr. Hainsfurther's comments into consideration when item 10 is up for discussion.
Mayor Rotering and City Manager Neukirch discussed how the public can participate in the meeting via Zoom.
SCHEDULED BUSINESS
ITEMS FOR OMNIBUS VOTE CONSIDERATION
Councilwoman Stone requested to remove items 2 and 7 from omnibus vote consideration.
Councilman Blumberg moved to approve items 1, 3-6 and 8 by omnibus vote consideration. Councilman Kaufman seconded the motion. Upon a roll call vote, the Mayor declared the motion passed unanimously.
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Anthony Blumberg, Councilman
SECONDER: Daniel Kaufman, Councilman
AYES: Mayor Rotering, Councilmen Stolberg, Stone, Kaufman, Blumberg, Knobel, Holleman
Administration
1. Adoption of a Resolution (R83-2020) by omnibus vote consideration titled, “A Resolution Amending the Annual Fee Resolution Regarding "E-A" Parking”.
Public Works
3. Adoption of a Resolution (R84-2020) by omnibus vote consideration titled, “A Resolution Approving a Local Public Agency Agreement for Phase II Engineering with the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) for the Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project”.
4. Adoption of a Resolution (R85-2020) by omnibus vote consideration titled, “A Resolution Authorizing Execution of a Phase II Preliminary Engineering Services Agreement for Federal Grant Participation for Central Avenue Bridge Replacement to Ciorba Group Inc., Chicago, Illinois”.
5. Adoption of a Resolution (R86-2020) by omnibus vote consideration titled, “A Resolution Approving a Local Public Agency Agreement for Phase II Engineering with the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) for the Park Avenue West Bridge Replacement Project”.
6. Adoption of a Resolution (R87-2020) by omnibus vote consideration titled, “A Resolution Authorizing Execution of a Phase II Preliminary Engineering Services Agreement for Federal Grant Participation for Park Avenue West Bridge Replacement to Horner & Shifrin Inc., Chicago, Illinois”.
Public Safety
8. Adoption of a Resolution (R88-2020) by omnibus vote consideration titled, “A Resolution Approving an Agreement with Frederick Quinn Corporation, of Addison, Illinois, for Construction Management Services”.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM OMNIBUS VOTE CONSIDERATION
2. Adoption of a Resolution (R89-2020) titled, “A Resolution Amending a Supplemental Rule Concerning Public Comments During Virtual Meetings of the City Council and Other City Boards, Commissions, and Committees”. Councilwoman Stone thanked the League of Women Voters for their comments. She noted that the Council and City staff are learning how to navigate virtual meetings and access should not be limited, especially during this time. She clarified that, under the proposed revision, the public comment would basically be the same as an in-person meeting.
Mayor Rotering confirmed that was correct.
Councilman Kaufman also thanked the League of Women Voters and noted how critical it is to have public participation during meetings.
Mayor Rotering highlighted how the Council has made accessibility and communication a strong priority. She stated how there was no intent to diminish public involvement during these meetings but rather, it was simply a matter of putting proper procedures in place during these virtual times. She stated that access has always been made to the public and thanked the community for their active participation in the City's meetings.
Councilman Blumberg noted that the written statements are for those individuals who are not comfortable at this point being on a live Zoom conference; access has been expanded while this technology has been put in place. He explained that there is no word limit on communication directly to the City Council via email or phone call before or after a meeting.
Mayor Rotering explained that individuals can write longer statement. Only those comments that would be read into the record are limited to a word count.
Councilman Stolberg echoed statements that had been previously made and reiterated the importance of public participation.
Mayor Rotering noted that texting is not a form of communication that the City engages in; the community needs to send e-mails or make a phone call. She explained that the City faces challenges when communication is sent via social media and requested that the community e-mail the City directly.
Councilwoman Stone moved to approve a Resolution Amending a Supplemental Rule Concerning Public Comments During Virtual Meetings of the City Council and Other City Boards, Commissions and Committees. Councilman Knobel seconded the motion. Upon a roll call vote, the Mayor declared the motion passed unanimously.
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Kim Stone, Councilwoman
SECONDER: Alyssa Knobel, Councilman
AYES: Mayor Rotering, Councilmen Stolberg, Stone, Kaufman, Blumberg, Knobel, Holleman
7. Adoption of an Ordinance (O47-2020) titled, “An Ordinance Approving An Amendment To A Special Use Permit In The Nature Of A Conditional Use For Operation Of A Fueling Station At The Public Works Garage And Office Facility (1150 Half Day Road)”.
Councilwoman Stone noted that there is a planting plan within the agenda packet which specifies that an herbicide will be applied prior to mulch being installed and she understood this is a special use permit not a contract to actually do the work but the City does have a policy to not use pesticides. She asked that the ordinance be approved but amend the approval to prohibit the use of the herbicide specifically mentioned in the planting plan.
City Manager Neukirch stated that it would be consistent with the City's policy.
Corporation Counsel Elrod suggested moving to approve the ordinance and confirm that notation.
Councilwoman Stone moved to approve an Ordinance Approving an Amendment to a Special use Permit in the Nature of a Conditional use for Operation of a Fueling Station at the Public Works Garage and Office Facility (1150 Half Day Road) and confirm the prohibition of the use of herbicide not withstanding in the planting plan. Councilman Blumberg seconded the motion. Upon a roll call vote, the Mayor declared the motion passed unanimously.
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Kim Stone, Councilwoman
SECONDER: Anthony Blumberg, Councilman
AYES: Mayor Rotering, Councilmen Stolberg, Stone, Kaufman, Blumberg, Knobel, Holleman
OTHER BUSINESS (the City Council will consider and then either approve or disapprove the following items)
Mayor Rotering moved item 11 ahead of items 9 and 10 on the agenda.
Community Development
11. A Referral of a Visual Clearance Variation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for Final Disposition Related to 1139 Bob-O-Link Road
Councilman Holleman moved to Refer the Visual Clearance Variation to the Zoning Board of Appeals for Final Disposition related to 1139 Bob-O-Link Road. Councilwoman Stone seconded the motion. Upon a roll call vote, the Mayor declared the motion passed unanimously.
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Michelle Holleman, Councilman
SECONDER: Kim Stone, Councilwoman
AYES: Mayor Rotering, Councilmen Stolberg, Stone, Kaufman, Blumberg, Knobel, Holleman
Administration
9. Consideration of a Motion to Extend the Emergency Declaration for the City of Highland Park, originally entered on March 14, 2020
Councilman Stolberg moved to extend the Emergency Declaration for the City of Highland Park, originally entered on March 14, 2020 to the adjournment of the City's next City Council meeting on July 13, 2020. Councilman Blumberg seconded the motion. Upon a roll call vote, the Mayor declared the motion passed unanimously.
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Adam Stolberg, Councilman
SECONDER: Anthony Blumberg, Councilman
AYES: Mayor Rotering, Councilmen Stolberg, Stone, Kaufman, Blumberg, Knobel, Holleman
Community Development
10. Adoption of a Resolution (R90-2020) titled, “A Resolution Approving a Preliminary Development Plan for a Planned Development and a Preliminary Inclusionary Housing Plan (1849 Green Bay Road and 1910 Second Street)”.
City Manager Neukirch noted that the applicant’s development team is present for the meeting and is available to answer any questions that may arise.
Community Development Director Fontane presented information as it relates to a preliminary development plan for a Planned Unit Development ("PUD") and a preliminary inclusionary housing plan at 1849 Green Bay Road and 1910 Second Street.
Mayor Rotering noted how this project has been under review for a little while now and the affordable housing proposal was recommended and approved by the Housing Commission. She stated that this is just the beginning of the review process and will continue to be reviewed in phases.
Community Development Director Fontane confirmed with Mayor Rotering that the review process will be conducted in phases. He explained that the City Code allows for the applicant to choose if the desire is to review the proposed development in phases or one final review.
Councilman Stolberg commented on the dollar amount that is required for the fee in-lieu based on a previous comment that was made by an individual from the public. He provided insight based on recent changes on how the dollar amount for the fee in lieu for the 4.8 affordable units was calculated.
RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: AYES:
ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
Adam Stolberg, Councilman
Anthony Blumberg, Councilman
Mayor Rotering, Councilmen Stolberg, Stone, Kaufman, Blumberg, Knobel, Holleman
Community Development Director Fontane confirmed Councilman Stolberg's comments.
Mayor Rotering noted that the Code was amended to allow for fractions in regards to the fee in-lieu calculation.
Councilman Stolberg asked if the applicant would need to take the seven public parking spaces or if the applicant would be more comfortable taking seven less underground parking spaces for a net loss of zero parking spaces for public parking.
Community Development Director Fontane mentioned that there had been discussion surrounding this topic and the Plan and Design Commission (“PDC”) had ultimately left that decision up to the City Council.
Councilwoman Stone commented on the surplus of underground parking spaces and was interested in the decision of whether or not to take seven less underground spots for a net loss of zero parking spaces for public parking. She noted that the proposed documents noted a requirement of 142 spaces underground and there are 158 spaces, where the surplus 16 spaces would be first offered to the inclusionary housing tenants free of charge and if there are additional stalls, they would be available to market rate tenants. She asked if the inclusionary housing units were already allocated a parking space.
Community Development Director Fontane stated that a parking space has to be allocated to an inclusionary housing tenant at no additional cost and by the City Code, an additional space could be provided in the same manner as the spaces are allocated to market rate tenants.
Councilwoman Stone noted that there is bike parking depicted on the proposed plan and asked if that was available to the public or just for resident use.
Community Development Director Fontane noted that it is in the public lot and would be available for general use, for residents and the public.
Councilwoman Stone stated that the blade sign looks nice in the rendering and voiced her concern that it may not be keeping with the character of the area. She discussed the percentage of inclusionary units that are available in terms of the size of the units and voiced concern that there will be more one bedroom units available versus larger units.
Community Development Director Fontane did note that the percentage of similar size inclusionary housing units needed to be proportionate to the market rate units but there was a departure request from the applicant and the recommendation was approved by the Housing Commission.
Councilwoman Stone noted that there is a great need for affordable rental units in town because it is very difficult to find affordable rental housing and requested a review to allow for more, larger units and less of the one bedroom units.
Community Development Director Fontane stated that this discussion was had with the Housing Commission and PDC did not opine on this topic because it is within the Housing Commission's jurisdiction. He explained this topic is a departure from the Code that the Housing Commission did consider and in terms of number of units required, it is one unit more for one bedroom and one unit less for two bedrooms. He provided information as to what is proposed for the number of units.
Councilwoman Stone asked what the explanation was as to why one more two bedroom affordable unit could not be provided.
Community Development Director Fontane stated that he would have to defer that to the applicant. He explained that essentially what it comes down to is how many units are going to be provided at different levels for need. He explained that in reviewing three bedroom units, the deficiency was small. He stated that, while there is a deficit, if another unit was provided, the applicant would be exceeding the requirement; it is difficult to get exactly the required number of units.
Mayor Rotering noted that the Housing Commission did approve what is being proposed and recommended.
Councilman Holleman provided information as to the robust conversation that was had by the Housing Commission regarding inclusionary and affordable housing units. She stated that the Housing Commission sees the fee in-lieu as a positive thing because there is a lack of other revenue and this is the only proposal that is being brought forward in terms of actually having a building project on site. She noted that some of the affordable units are larger per square foot than some of the market rate units. She explained that the applicant has done what was asked of them and they have built a strong plan with a beautiful luxury building. She noted the importance of the money that is brought in and how it is leveraged by Community Partners for Affordable Housing ("CPAH") and other revenue sources to be able to build additional units.
Mayor Rotering thanked Councilman Holleman for discussing the financial piece in regards to affordable housing.
Councilman Blumberg stated that he discussed with Corporation Counsel what this presentation means to be a preliminary approval because it is not quite the nature of a preliminary approval that the Council went through with Albion's other development. He noted that with the other development, the preliminary proposal came before the Council before the other Commissions reviewed the proposal. He noted that for this project, the Commissions have reviewed the proposal and sees this as a positive move. He noted that this project is preliminary because there is not a final engineering plan and that is a good move in order to get a sense as to if the Council is likely to approve the preliminary proposal.
Councilman Kaufman stated that he is generally supportive of the preliminary plan but he does have some concerns regarding the analysis and conclusions related to affordable housing. He noted the importance of the Mayor's comments that the City does have core values of promoting diversity and inclusivity, and the City has a proud historic commitment to diversity and inclusiveness. He stated that these two elements are the foundation of the City’s affordable housing policy and programs, and Highland Park is recognized as a leader in affordable housing. Affordable housing is particularly relevant today given the current movement toward achieving equality, and a more equitable and just society. He voiced the concerns he had with the proposed inclusionary housing plan.
Councilman Kaufman first addressed the preliminary plan’s proposal to pay a fee in-lieu for certain units not provided on-site rather than to provide the units on-site. He noted the intent and preference of the City’s Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance are for the provisions of permanently affordable housing units constructed on-site. He stated that under the City’s Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance, if a developer intends to provide an alternative to the provision of the required number of affordable housing units on-site, the developer must demonstrate that the alternative will further affordable housing opportunities in the City to an equal or greater extent than compliance with the on-site requirements. He stated that to meet that standard, a rigorous analysis could include: 1) evidence showing why all of the required inclusionary units cannot be provided on-site; 2) weighing how the affordable housing opportunities provided by building the affordable units on-site compare with the affordable housing opportunities likely to be provided through a cash buyout; and 3) whether the proposed cash payment actually is sufficient to provide at least comparable or greater affordable housing opportunities. He stated that is the analysis the alternate compliance standard calls for to satisfy the letter and spirit of the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance.
Councilman Kaufman also expressed concern about the distribution of affordable units among the income tiers in the preliminary plan. He stated that he is concerned that the reference in the package to average affordability for the project as a whole might convey the misimpression that this is a standard for evaluating a request for departure from the requirements for distributing the affordable units among the three income tiers. He stated that the clear intent of the ordinance language is to prioritize allocation to the lower income tiers when the units don’t distribute equally. He noted that the families in the lower income tier are the families with the greatest needs and the ones who are least likely to be served by the conventional market. He stated that even though the difference might seem incremental, the impact is significate, and the details of a policy or practice can have profound consequences, particularly when the consequences are allowed to accumulate over time. He further stated that we established criteria for departures from the standards to protect the public interests of those the standards are designed to serve, and to ensure that protection we need to require applicants to demonstrate how they meet the criteria for departure. He stated that Section 150.2180 of the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance sets forth a three-prong test that must be met by the applicant. The most relevant here, he stated, is the first: “(A) Due to specific and unique circumstances, undue hardship would be caused by the literal enforcement of the standards and requirements set forth in this Article.” He stated that the analysis of undue hardship should seriously probe the actual economic impact that “literal enforcement” would have on a project. Applicants should be required to demonstrate that undue hardship is, why it is undue, and how it is created by the “specific and unique circumstances.”
Councilman Kaufman also expressed concern about the bedroom mix of affordable units in the preliminary plan. He noted that Section 150.210(E)(1) of the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance states: “The bedroom mix of affordable units shall be in equal proportion to the bedroom mix of the market rate units.” He stated that as literal compliance is not possible in this instance as is stated in the findings of fact, then the goal would therefore be to come as close as possible to compliance with “equal proportion.” He added that to do a proper analysis of the departure from literal compliance regarding the bedroom mix requires rigorously examining whether the standard has been met is to probe and evaluate the actual economic impact that “literal enforcement” would have on a project. He stated that again, applicants should be required to demonstrate what the undue hardship is, why it is undue, and how it is created by “specific and unique circumstances.”
Councilman Kaufman noted that he hopes these comments provide guidance for the future so that we can fulfill the goals of the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance while continuing to facilitate development. He added that fulfilling the goals of the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance and providing affordable housing are even more critical given the current economic and social conditions in our country, and the movement to attain a more equitable and just society.
Mayor Rotering thanked Councilman Kaufman for his comments and the Council for having a robust conversation about this topic. She noted that there have been very few projects that have given the Council a dilemma in regards to affordable housing availability. She voiced her appreciation for the proposed project that has the potential to provide a number of many units. She asked Councilman Holleman to address some of the questions and concerns that were mentioned by Councilman Kaufman.
Councilman Holleman provided further information as to the findings and discussions that took place at the Housing Commission meetings in order to come to the conclusion and recommendation that is being brought to the Council for deliberation.
Community Development Director Fontane continued the discussion regarding the findings from the Housing Commission meetings.
Cal Bernstein, attorney for the applicant, presented information regarding the preliminary development plan and preliminary inclusionary housing plan.
Councilwoman Stone, Community Development Director Fontane and Andrew Yule, Vice President with Albion, discussed the illumination of the proposed blade sign.
Mr. Yule noted that they will review what is currently being proposed for illumination of the proposed blade sign and see if there are other options that could be used based on recommendations from the Council and staff.
Councilman Blumberg asked about the pre-application and the ratio of onsite affordable units to paid in-lieu units and asked if the differences could be explained.
Mr. Bernstein stated that it was proposed to mirror the ratio that is at the approved development currently underway at the old Karger Center location and the Memorandum of Understanding that was accepted by the City demonstrated that there would be at least 10.6 affordable units to market rate units.
Councilman Blumberg noted that at the time of the pre-application, there was a ratio of fee in-lieu to built units and noted that he had asked if the applicant could improve upon that ratio and have more units available on site.
Mr. Bernstein stated that initially, there were going to be nine units placed on site but after discussions with staff and the Housing Commission, the number of available units was increased to 10 to create that ratio of over 11%.
Councilman Blumberg asked about the fee in-lieu discussion that was conducted at the Housing Commission and how it was going to satisfy the requirement of providing for an equal or greater opportunity for offsite unit development. He noted his appreciation for the comments that were made by Councilman Holleman as to what may be intended.
Mr. Bernstein expanded on the discussion regarding fee in-lieu that was had at the Housing Commission meetings.
Councilman Blumberg and Mr. Bernstein discussed the standards that have been set and the needs to meet those standards for affordable housing and fee in-lieu payments.
Mr. Bernstein discussed the number of affordable units that will be available between the already approved development and this proposed development.
Councilman Knobel noted how there have been multiple housing discussions that have already taken place and commented on the discussion that has taken place tonight. She voiced her appreciation for the proposed development. She stated that if this project does not move forward, there will be a loss of affordable units for the community and there is no way of knowing when another opportunity like this one will present itself. She provided information as to the intent of the affordable housing policy. She stated how this project assists in balancing a lot of the needs of the community and assists the City in reaching a lot of goals. She voiced her appreciation of the proposed blade sign because it will give a sense of place and purpose within the business district.
Michael Laxner, Highland Park resident, provided comment via Zoom chat and voiced his appreciation for the proposed project.
Betsy Lassar, Highland Park resident, provided comment via Zoom chat and discussed fee in-lieu.
City Manager Neukirch read into the record comments made by Lori Williams with Collaborative Community Housing Initiative. Ms. Williams asked about the size of the units, how individuals with disabilities may be accommodated, and what community organizations the developer will be working with. She commented on diversity of developers and diversity of tenants. She stated that the developers should be doing more for affordable housing.
Councilman Blumberg voiced his appreciation in the responses and details that were provided during tonight's discussion. He discussed the difficult decision regarding the balance between the need for increased residential density projects, which are very important, against the need for affordable housing particularly in the proposed location. He noted that the developer has made reasonable efforts to reach the balance and voiced his remaining concerns regarding affordable housing.
Councilman Knobel moved to approve a Resolution Approving a Preliminary Development Plan for a Planned Development and a Preliminary Inclusionary Housing Plan at 1849 Green Bay Road and 1910 Second Street. Councilman Holleman seconded the motion. Upon a roll call vote, the Mayor declared the motion passed unanimously.
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Alyssa Knobel, Councilman
SECONDER: Michelle Holleman, Councilman
AYES: Mayor Rotering, Councilmen Stolberg, Stone, Kaufman, Blumberg, Knobel, Holleman
BUSINESS FROM THE COUNCIL
There was none.
BUSINESS FROM CITY STAFF
City Manager Neukirch presented an update of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the ways the City is working with other local government partners to assist the community during this time.
Mayor Rotering thanked everyone for the sacrifices they have made and how important it is to remain cautious.
Councilman Holleman thanked City Manager Neukirch and staff for the efforts that have been made to keep businesses moving during the pandemic. She discussed how it’s been beneficial to the restaurants and community to have access to outdoor dining.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilman Kaufman moved to adjourn. Councilman Knobel seconded the motion. On a roll call vote, Mayor Rotering declared the motion passed unanimously.
The City Council adjourned its meeting at 7:55 PM.
http://highlandparkil.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=12&ID=2380&Inline=True
Alerts Sign-up